Indy Dave Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Seems to still be a big difference in man vs machine. Is it just a matter of the correct algorithm(s) to have the Bot get the most of out the bike or are the intrinsic decisions and experience we draw on as we ride incalculable in mathematical terms? No doubt if the Bot was studying my lines and technique, it would give up due to so many random variables. But a human machine like Rossi (or Bernie, Kinsley, etc) should generate some closely repeatable data sets. BikeBot VS Rossi on the track Link to comment
Medic Mike Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 In the video, it looked more like a drone situation versus a straight up AI running the show. Granted, my tech prowess ends with my S8.... Link to comment
Indy Dave Posted November 4, 2017 Author Share Posted November 4, 2017 I think to be realistic, they need to have a 'drone' in a rider position to mimic lean, weight and COG to be as realistic as possible. We many so many inputs based on what we feel and sense the bike doing. And so much of that is bases on prior experience. That's a lot of data to sort through in milliseconds for a machine and perhaps our previous experiences compute faster that teh Bot is able to sort through all the [current] logarithms? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now