BMWSportTouring BMWST DB
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#639013 - 09/24/10 05:54 AM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: dduelin]  
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 203
mig Offline
Member
mig  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 203
Vallejo, California
Dave
true that. The motor does rock at low RPM's. but at cruise it is very smooth and has a nice gruntal sound. Coming from 16 years on my 95 ST I expected some shake but past the low end its pretty smooth. I do miss my V4 but this bike just rocks in so many positive ways.


2016 R1200 RTW
2007 R1200 RT 98k
1995 ST1100 257k
1983 Honda 650 NightHawk 180k+
1974 Yamaha RD350 (insane acceleration)
19?? Honda SL350
#639575 - 09/26/10 07:17 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: N214RR]  
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,033
SuperG Offline
Member
SuperG  Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,033
Central Texas
N214RR

Excellent and honest write up.
As others have said it before me. The V4 motor awesome so as the trans, but for the rest of the features the RT wins the cake.

#639781 - 09/27/10 03:07 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: SuperG]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 506
drodg Offline
Member
drodg  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 506
Indiana, United States
Originally Posted By: Lov2fly
N214RR

Excellent and honest write up.
As others have said it before me. The V4 motor awesome so as the trans, but for the rest of the features the RT wins the cake.


I have always thought the R1200Rt with the Honda's engine.


2006 R1200RT
#639984 - 09/28/10 12:27 AM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: dduelin]  
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,977
outpost22 Offline
Member
outpost22  Offline
Member

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,977
Eagle Point, Oregon
Originally Posted By: dduelin
It is charming in a bike developed and refined since the early part of the last century - but can't the engineers refine the boxer to standards of power and smoothness obtained by other manufacturers 4 decades ago?


That's "character" you're referring to smirk

Vibration is so subjective. I climb off my thumper and think the RT motor is as smooth as a sewing machine.

Thanks to the OP for the initial write up. Very well done.


Ladies, if a man says he'll fix something, he will. There's no sense reminding him every 6 months or so.
'96 R1100RT
'06 F650GS
#640762 - 09/30/10 03:23 AM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: outpost22]  
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,103
cali_beemer Offline
Member
cali_beemer  Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,103
Folsom, CA
I have had both the ST1300 and the 1200RT. I dont have alot of good to say about the Honda. The gauges are hard to read in sunlight, its hotter than hell on the boys (and the glove compartment will melt things)...., low ground clearance and always scraping pegs, suspension was awfull, areodynamics were a joke, bike was unstable above 80 mph, way too much to dislike on one bike. On the other hand the 1200RT was a complete marvel to ride. Quite possibly the best motorcycle I have ridden to date. I have nothing but good things to say about it and its the one bike I regret selling. I dont ride a BMW but thats from reliability/maintenace issues. If i were to go back to BMW it would most likely be another RT.


I should also note my ST had the lean surge issue. Anytime the bike went above 2000ft in elevation the motor would surge and quite heavily at times. The Honda dealer was no help and looking on the forums, I found I was not the only one with the issue. This took the joy out of the engine for me.

Last edited by cali_beemer; 09/30/10 03:26 AM.

2004 R1150RT

"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help." Ronald Reagan
#640907 - 09/30/10 04:33 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: cali_beemer]  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 641
Dave_zoom_zoom Offline
Member
Dave_zoom_zoom  Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 641
British Columbia Canada
Originally Posted By: cali_beemer
I have had both the ST1300 and the 1200RT. I dont have alot of good to say about the Honda. The gauges are hard to read in sunlight, its hotter than hell on the boys (and the glove compartment will melt things)...., low ground clearance and always scraping pegs, suspension was awfull, areodynamics were a joke, bike was unstable above 80 mph, way too much to dislike on one bike. On the other hand the 1200RT was a complete marvel to ride. Quite possibly the best motorcycle I have ridden to date. I have nothing but good things to say about it and its the one bike I regret selling. I dont ride a BMW but thats from reliability/maintenace issues. If i were to go back to BMW it would most likely be another RT.


I should also note my ST had the lean surge issue. Anytime the bike went above 2000ft in elevation the motor would surge and quite heavily at times. The Honda dealer was no help and looking on the forums, I found I was not the only one with the issue. This took the joy out of the engine for me.



WOW!!!! Now there's a man of passion!

Why don't you tell us what you really think Cali?

Last edited by Dave_zoom_zoom; 09/30/10 04:35 PM.
#641404 - 10/01/10 11:08 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: drodg]  
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
N214RR Offline
Newer Member
N214RR  Offline
Newer Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
WI
Originally Posted By: drodg
Originally Posted By: Lov2fly
N214RR

Excellent and honest write up.
As others have said it before me. The V4 motor awesome so as the trans, but for the rest of the features the RT wins the cake.


I have always thought the R1200Rt with the Honda's engine.


Good way to put it, but only IF you can have the V4 without any extra weight or heat.


4RR

2009 BMW R1200RT
2006 Honda ST1300
2008 Kawasaki Ninja 650
2007 Suzuki V-Strom 650
2002 Honda XR200R
1969 Piper PA28-235
2008 RV-4
#641407 - 10/01/10 11:14 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: outpost22]  
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
N214RR Offline
Newer Member
N214RR  Offline
Newer Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
WI
Originally Posted By: outpost22
Originally Posted By: dduelin
It is charming in a bike developed and refined since the early part of the last century - but can't the engineers refine the boxer to standards of power and smoothness obtained by other manufacturers 4 decades ago?


That's "character" you're referring to smirk

Vibration is so subjective. I climb off my thumper and think the RT motor is as smooth as a sewing machine.



The RT motor is definitely not as smooth as the Honda V4, but I don't find it objectionable. At highway speed the mirrors on the ST are crystal clear, the RT's have just a very slight blur. Still very clear, just not as clear as the Honda's mirrors. The vibration felt in the grips is not even noticable to me.

Also I like the RT's sound better than the V4.


4RR

2009 BMW R1200RT
2006 Honda ST1300
2008 Kawasaki Ninja 650
2007 Suzuki V-Strom 650
2002 Honda XR200R
1969 Piper PA28-235
2008 RV-4
#641410 - 10/01/10 11:23 PM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: N214RR]  
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,033
SuperG Offline
Member
SuperG  Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,033
Central Texas
This is off subject.

N214RR
Did you build the RV-4 or bought it fully built.
Either way, I am envious(very). smile

#642111 - 10/05/10 12:15 AM Re: BMW R1200RT vs Honda ST1300 [Re: SuperG]  
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
N214RR Offline
Newer Member
N214RR  Offline
Newer Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
WI

Built it, and thanks, it's quite the hotrod.








4RR

2009 BMW R1200RT
2006 Honda ST1300
2008 Kawasaki Ninja 650
2007 Suzuki V-Strom 650
2002 Honda XR200R
1969 Piper PA28-235
2008 RV-4
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 2.8073 MB (Peak: 2.9967 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-12-16 13:01:59 UTC