Red Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 My spousal unit is looking for a new ride. 5'4'' and inseam challenged. We looked at the new Triumph Street Twins. Of course it is mid winter and no test ride possible. She's a day ride only person so multi day comfort saddle is not important nor is luggage space or all the things that make a touring (my kind) of bike suitable. I ask because I'm not a good judge on this bike as I cut my teeth on Triumphs in the 60's & 70's and the nostalgia force is strong. Anyone have experience or informed opinions on the Triumph Street Twin? Link to comment
TEWKS Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 I missed the force you speak of by about ten years but was at the dealership a while back and they had the bike on the floor. Now, in a room full of very expensive BMW motorcycles I couldn't take my eyes off the Street Twin. The salesman started the bike for me and I couldn't believe the awesome sound it produced from even the stock pipes. I zipped my Stitch and got out of the danger zone in a hurry. Listen and prepare to spend! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RuWVlOO6P8I Pat Link to comment
powwow Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Peter Egan did a nice road test write up on the T 120 in Cycle World magazine a few months ago: http://www.cycleworld.com/2016-triumph-bonneville-t120-standard-motorcycle-review-road-test Prepare to open your check book. Link to comment
John in VA Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 IMO It's a sweet bike -- classic-cool looking yet thoroughly modern. Link to comment
Red Posted February 22, 2017 Author Share Posted February 22, 2017 (edited) So, now I'm a wee bit confused. The literature I have says the motor in the Street Twin is a 900cc rather than the 1200 in the Bonneville. Literature says it's a "...high-torque engine...delivering 18% more peak torque than the previous generation: the1200cc high-torque engine of the Bonneville T120 and the T120 Black; and the 1200cc high-power Thruxton spec engine from the Thruxton and the Thruxton R." It goes on to say the Street Twin also has a 36% improved fuel economy as well. So, more torque, 25% smaller displacement, 36% better mileage sounds almost too good to be true. Must be some flaw to balance out all that good stuff; vibrates, eats chains, wobbles on hard deceleration, ride by wire is goofy, what? Edited February 22, 2017 by Red Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 (edited) Red, Yes the Street Twin (and Street Cup) use 900cc "high torque" motors. From what I have read, peak horsepower is down from the last generation air-cooled motor. Significantly, peak torque has increased. No magic; that's just an atypical change. Obviously, our friends at H-D emphasize low-RPM torque at the expense of peak horsepower and it seems to work. I may have misunderstood your comparison of the 900cc and 1200cc motors. The 1200 motors produce both more power and more torque than the 900s. Interestingly, there are two variations of the high torque 1200, with the Bobber producing more peak torque (at lower RPM) than the Bonneville T120. Although you asked for empirical evidence, allow me to say that without having ridden any of the new Bonnevilles or their relatives, I like them. Unlike just about every other manufacturer, Triumph understands the appeal of bikes with "classic" aesthetics. Admittedly, they have a series of bikes with irregularly shaped headlamps and way too much clearance between the rear tire and fender, but the Bonneville family is not in that group. One of the the forum members rode a Bonneville T120 (dual discs on the front) and was underwhelmed by its lack of braking power. That bears further inquiry. Bob Edited February 22, 2017 by Bob_Sheehan Link to comment
Bill_Walker Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 So, now I'm a wee bit confused. The literature I have says the motor in the Street Twin is a 900cc rather than the 1200 in the Bonneville. Literature says it's a "...high-torque engine...delivering 18% more peak torque than the previous generation: the1200cc high-torque engine of the Bonneville T120 and the T120 Black; and the 1200cc high-power Thruxton spec engine from the Thruxton and the Thruxton R." It goes on to say the Street Twin also has a 36% improved fuel economy as well. So, more torque, 25% smaller displacement, 36% better mileage sounds almost too good to be true. Must be some flaw to balance out all that good stuff; vibrates, eats chains, wobbles on hard deceleration, ride by wire is goofy, what? You might be comparing apples and oranges. The new T120s use the 1200 cc engine, but the prior T100s used an 865 cc engine. The 1200 is new. The Street Twin and some other models use basically the old engine, with updates, as I understand it. Those performance comparisons may be relative to the prior T100, rather than to the T120. Link to comment
ERdok Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I can't speak to the T-120 or the new "street" specifically but I currently have a 2011 T-100 and previously had a 09' Scrambler, both of which have the 865cc engine. Besides looking awesome, they ride great, are reliable and easy to service. Just be prepared to spend extra time at stops...explaining it's not a restored 62 Bonnie... Link to comment
hopz Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I can throw-in some data that has not been mentioned ... yet. I too fell for the Triumph twins and after several look-it-over sessions I finally took a test ride. It was a fine bike, totally acceptable until... I had to stop the bike for the first red light. Ooops! Where is the breaking?. I was pushing on and pulling the various levers but very little perception of braking. Of course after years of riding BMW's and their highly effective braking systems- it may have just been a matter of high expectations. I got it stopped at the light then did a U-turn and putted back to the dealer. They had no explanation or even rationalizations. My advice is to have a test ride before making any decisions. Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 You might be comparing apples and oranges. The new T120s use the 1200 cc engine, but the prior T100s used an 865 cc engine. The 1200 is new. The Street Twin and some other models use basically the old engine, with updates, as I understand it. Those performance comparisons may be relative to the prior T100, rather than to the T120. Bill, The T100 also uses a new water-cooled motor; it displaces 899cc. Bob Link to comment
twistyguy Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 The T-120 is absolutely gorgeous and a blast to ride. It is a great day trip type bike. I gave one an extensive test ride and had a huge grin the whole time. Beautiful, beautiful bike. Great motor, riding position, ABS. I wouldn't choose it as a touring bike as there are no good options for bags and it's a chain drive train. I also prefer linked brakes. But it's a stunningly beautiful bike really enjoyable to ride. Link to comment
SoCalBmr Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 I have a Honda 750 as a second bike, and love it. My vertically challenged buddy rides it, too, sometimes. It took a few small mods, but for $1500.00, couldn't go wrong. Link to comment
Red Posted March 16, 2017 Author Share Posted March 16, 2017 My bride was riding a 1982 Yam XJ750 previous to whatever comes next. I don't think any new bike today will be a disappointment in braking. Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 (edited) Today I rode a Street Cup (a Street Twin with café racer details), and I *really* liked it. That motor is a gem. Yes, the single disc could be stronger. I rode to the Triumph dealer on my 1975 Honda, so the brakes were not a problem. I also rode a Street Triple. Fabulous brakes, suspension, and power. However, its appearance would probably never grow on me. And something about the Triple seemed to encourage irresponsible riding. "No Officer, it's not my fault." Bob Edited March 17, 2017 by Bob_Sheehan Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Two days ago, I bought a new Thruxton. Holy smokes. I haven't had this much fun on a bike since I was in my teens. Bob Link to comment
twistyguy Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Great bike. Wish I had enough room in my garage for one. Enjoy! Link to comment
TEWKS Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Two days ago, I bought a new Thruxton. Holy smokes. Announcements such as this require a picture. Rules are rules! Cool!! Pat Link to comment
Ghost60 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 I've always liked the Thruxton. Congrats. Link to comment
Chris K Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Congrats Bob. That is a beauty! Link to comment
sardineone Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Congrats Bob, it's a looker! And you got your 2nd front disc brake in the bargain! Have FUN! Link to comment
Bill_Walker Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Nice, Bob! Is it my imagination, or is that temporary plate the size of a car license plate? Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Nice, Bob! Is it my imagination, or is that temporary plate the size of a car license plate? I think it might be larger. Link to comment
Red Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 We will need a ride report. Link to comment
Missouri Bob Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 (edited) I've been riding a 2008 R1200GS for the past six years, and for the most part, it is a terrific bike. Although mine was lowered at the factory, its seat is still higher than I would prefer. And then there is how the GS looks. It's grown on me, but I wanted something with more traditional aesthetics. So, the Triumph has a lower seat and the bike is, IMO, much more attractive. It is also quicker, and possibly smoother, than my BMW. However, it does not seem to be as well-designed as a BMW. The BMW's brakes are far better (and linked). The suspension is probably comparable, but to minimize front-end dive, the forks are less supple than those on a tele-lever bike. The Triumph appears to be put together with an attention to detail that previously eluded Triumph. I hope that its finish will hold up as well as that of my GS. Because the Thruxton uses inner-tubes, I will most likely get the rims sealed so that I can lose the tubes. Today, I removed the rear wheel just to see how much work was involved. Not a good time. A Street Twin uses tubeless tires and can be ordered with a center-stand; things I would want. In terms of engineering and "feel", I suppose that I would describe my Thruxton as somewhere between a BMW and a Sportster, but more toward the BMW end of the spectrum. It is very much fun to ride. Ask me again in a year or two. Bob Edited April 5, 2017 by Bob_Sheehan Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now